• Become a Subscribing Member today!

    PiperForum.com is a vibrant community of Piper owners and pilots with over 1,500+ active members.

    Access to PiperForum.com is subscription based. Subscriptions are only $49.99/year or $6.99/month to gain access to this great community and unmatched library of Piper knowledge.

    Why become a Subscribing Member?

    • Swap technical knowledge, plan meetups and sell planes/parts.
    • We host technical knowledge of general aviation topics and specific topics on J3-Cubs, Cherokees, Comanches, Pacers and more.
    • In addition to an instant community of pilots for you, PiperForum.com is a library of technical topics, airplane builds, images, technical manuals, technical documents and more.

    Become a Subscribing Member and access PiperForum.com in full!

    Subscribe Now

Looking for arguments for next airplane..

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Dec 13, 2021
Messages
255
Reaction score
112
I'm currently flying a 76 Archer.

Love the airplane, except for the service ceiling, and climb rates. My missions is not very complicated, Angel Flights in the Seattle area. Want to carry about 500 lbs of passengers + luggage, with about 4-5 hrs of fuel.

Love archer for its cost of ownership, dispatch rate, and its easy to fly.

The Archer actually can carry 450 lbs of pax + luggage + pilots and full fuel.

I'm circling the drain on two airframes. The Cessna 182 (P model maybe), and the Dakota (early dakota model, mid to late 70's)

And I'm here to get some arguments for the Dakota over the 182 for my list of pro's / cons.

The budget is about $300k .. give or take a few $10k's .. -- for acquisition, retrofit to a nice glass panel for IFR (the works), and first year maintenance surprises.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top