• Become a Subscribing Member today!

    PiperForum.com is a vibrant community of Piper owners and pilots with over 1,500+ active members.

    Access to PiperForum.com is subscription based. Subscriptions are only $49.99/year or $6.99/month to gain access to this great community and unmatched library of Piper knowledge.

    Why become a Subscribing Member?

    • Swap technical knowledge, plan meetups and sell planes/parts.
    • We host technical knowledge of general aviation topics and specific topics on J3-Cubs, Cherokees, Comanches, Pacers and more.
    • In addition to an instant community of pilots for you, PiperForum.com is a library of technical topics, airplane builds, images, technical manuals, technical documents and more.

    Become a Subscribing Member and access PiperForum.com in full!

    Subscribe Now

STEC-20 (rate-based) - GPSS and VLOC coupled approaches compared

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Canuck

David Megginson
Joined
Mar 31, 2016
Messages
7,085
Reaction score
3,903
While I was practicing approaches this morning, I ended up with an ILS and then an RNAV (LPV) approach to the same runway, so I thought it would be interesting to compare the tracks. I'm using an STEC-20 (rate-based) single-axis autopilot, and there was light chop and thermal activity.

The first approach is the CYOW ILS 32 — I approach from the east on vectors with the autopilot in heading mode, then switch to HI (Nav) mode once I've intercepted the inbound. As you can see in the screencap below, there's some mild scalloping (which showed up as ± half a dot on my CDI) at first while the STEC-20 adjusts to the crosswind, then from that point on, it's tracking the localiser precisely with a 10° crosswind correction all the way in (there's no more scalloping past the part I cropped).

The second approach is the CYOW RNAV 32 Z — I approach from the west on the base leg of the T, with the autopilot in GPSS mode, and the autopilot keeps me absolutely straight all the way in (that's the base line that the first one scallops around).

Make of it what you will. I see no reason to replace my old STEC-20 with a new, all-digital A/P until it fails on me some day, because it gets the job done.

1625418021239.png
 

Latest posts

Back
Top