• Become a Subscribing Member today!

    PiperForum.com is a vibrant community of Piper owners and pilots with over 1,500+ active members.

    Access to PiperForum.com is subscription based. Subscriptions are only $49.99/year or $6.99/month to gain access to this great community and unmatched library of Piper knowledge.

    Why become a Subscribing Member?

    • Swap technical knowledge, plan meetups and sell planes/parts.
    • We host technical knowledge of general aviation topics and specific topics on J3-Cubs, Cherokees, Comanches, Pacers and more.
    • In addition to an instant community of pilots for you, PiperForum.com is a library of technical topics, airplane builds, images, technical manuals, technical documents and more.

    Become a Subscribing Member and access PiperForum.com in full!

    Subscribe Now

Why don't GPS navcomms fall back on VORs?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Canuck

David Megginson
Joined
Mar 31, 2016
Messages
7,085
Reaction score
3,903
If my GTN loses GPS integrity, it will fall back to a loose kind of dead-reckoning and project my last track forward.

I'm curious about why modern GPS comms don't fall back on VOR for enroute position? They know where they lost signal, and could try to triangulate from navaids in range to fix your position within at least a mile or so. The algorithm would be orders of magnitude simpler than the one required for acquiring and triangulating GPS satellites.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top