• Become a Subscribing Member today!

    PiperForum.com is a vibrant community of Piper owners and pilots with over 1,500+ active members.

    Access to PiperForum.com is subscription based. Subscriptions are only $49.99/year or $6.99/month to gain access to this great community and unmatched library of Piper knowledge.

    Why become a Subscribing Member?

    • Swap technical knowledge, plan meetups and sell planes/parts.
    • We host technical knowledge of general aviation topics and specific topics on J3-Cubs, Cherokees, Comanches, Pacers and more.
    • In addition to an instant community of pilots for you, PiperForum.com is a library of technical topics, airplane builds, images, technical manuals, technical documents and more.

    Become a Subscribing Member and access PiperForum.com in full!

    Subscribe Now

SFO 777 crash

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Apr 25, 2010
Messages
8,127
Reaction score
2,368
Location
Western Massachusetts
The media is all blaming the pilot, who, although very experienced in other heavy jets (747) was new to the 777.

As my son has entered the airline pilot ranks I have learned some things that the general public, and media, appear to be unaware of. We no longer have a "pilot" and a "copilot". We have a pilot-flying, PF, and a pilot-not-flying, PNF. The Captain and FO generally switch roles on each leg of a flight. The PNF duties are perhaps more important to flight safety than those of the PF. When my son was PF in an ATR and lost an engine he was thankful that the more experienced Captain was PNF at the time.

If this accident was the result of piloting error (as seems to be the case) it is the PNF, whose job it is to monitor the approach, who screwed up.
 




 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top