• Become a Subscribing Member today!

    PiperForum.com is a vibrant community of Piper owners and pilots with over 1,500+ active members.

    Access to PiperForum.com is subscription based. Subscriptions are only $49.99/year or $6.99/month to gain access to this great community and unmatched library of Piper knowledge.

    Why become a Subscribing Member?

    • Swap technical knowledge, plan meetups and sell planes/parts.
    • We host technical knowledge of general aviation topics and specific topics on J3-Cubs, Cherokees, Comanches, Pacers and more.
    • In addition to an instant community of pilots for you, PiperForum.com is a library of technical topics, airplane builds, images, technical manuals, technical documents and more.

    Become a Subscribing Member and access PiperForum.com in full!

    Subscribe Now

Reply to thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

My point in digressing the thread is that if it's wrong to let students have the major role in evaluating their professors, it can also be risky to have non-mechanics critically evaluating an AP/IA, particularly if it was something "not done" rather than something "done".  If it goes to court, the expert's opinion will prevail.  Best to just express disapproval by word of mouth locally.


Back
Top